Comments on: Pro-Test march strikes historic note

By: scientist

scientist — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 10:26:19 +0000

um um sorry wait “you all need your brain checked” and “No fence(:” you guys make less and less sense every day.
anywhom animal testing is not tortoure, for most procedures the animals are anesthetised unless we need to know if there are paiful side effects.
and yes as concious beings we do have the right to kill other animals as long as it even has the potential to save human lives. sorry but it kind of happens in nature. The very animals you are trying to stop us from euthanising if in the wild would probably maul mutilate and eat alive other animals.
But thats just natural you say. Yeah well its just natural for us to test life saving drugs on animals.
In your situation “your child survives but someone elses dies”. well with no animal testing at all then both children would probably die so morally which is better.
Animal testing is not an argument of morals it is about causing the least amount of pain and suffering to humans FULL STOP. Im not saying animals do not matter but as a sentient species, the death of a thousand animals is worth saving the life of one human.
The only reason you are able to campaign is because the world has advanced so far and become ‘civilized’ this only happened because of science that was accelerated by animal testing.
Now you seek to destroy the one thing that enables this entire argument to continue to rage, civilisation.

Anti-vivisectionists would have us living in the stone age eating roots. I SAY NO!

By: scientist

scientist — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 10:14:47 +0000

uuuum sorry honey but what they say is true. in fact its all true. if you actually read the science in the article you would realize it develops real solutions to medical problems. and whoa funnyly enough testing on dogs created a treatment for canine diabetes. so oops sorry it saves animal lives too.
about you still being alive well if not for animal testing your mother or grandmother would probably have died so you wouldnt exist in a non-animal testing world. as for Animals being more important……. well go down to your local abatoiir and jump into one of the mincing machines please for the sake of the human gene pool. Just in case anyone thinks this is some old proffessor bashing on an 11 year old. i’m only 13
Survival of the fittest – Vivisection is the way forwards

By: Ayushi

Ayushi — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:01:01 +0000

WOW,,

N I thought we were actually getting somewhere,before these idiots came on the scene.
No offence to anyone I’m just saying since when was it right to torture any living thing.Come on what planet are you retards from like its okey for u to live but those animals can’t.

ALL PRO-TESTERS GO PLAY IN TRAFFIC!

Say whay u want I don’t care but you have nerve like commmmeee onnn.

What planet are you bleeders from.

Ur child might have survived,,
But didn’t anothers die?

There are other things then leaving baby monkeys in caes
and only being let out to be tested on……

Man seriously all you need your brain checked..
no fence(:

By: Catrina

Catrina — Fri, 02 May 2008 00:50:55 +0000

IS there really a reason for animal teswting? HOW did it save your life??
It didn’t! ALL of you NEED to STOP animal testing. Why don’t you die for someone else! Huh?!!?! THIS IS INHUMAIN!

By: Ecofacist

Ecofacist — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:24:28 +0000

There is already too many humans in earth. We must reduce numbers of human AT LEAST to 4 billion or less.

By: from Belgium

from Belgium — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:47:44 +0000

we are not alone on the earth, the animals has also the right to live in freedom.
I don’t understand why this organisation is created. I find it egoistic. Because when the people is sick, they have to make a lot of animals sick.

I love animals and never I will do something like this organisation.
It’s pitiful

By: from Belgium

from Belgium — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:42:56 +0000

Why do they do animal-tests?
Because they will save the lives of the peolpe.
And why do the animals haven’t to live there own live
they have to be ill for the people. I find it horrific. Give the animals also a chance

By: florian

florian — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:36:15 +0000

I find it sordid,
the people is not the only one on the earth

By: florian

florian — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:36:14 +0000

I find it sordid,
the people is not the only one on the earth

By: Ladean

Ladean — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:18:59 +0000

well i think animal testing is very very cruel! you all should be ashamed of yourselves imagine poor little rabbits and other animals having a miserable life and animal testing does not save lives does it save the animals lives? NO IT DOESN’T!!!! have you looked at all these photos of animals being cruely abused and you can live without animal testing i do and look im still here typing!!! i am only 11 and since i was 3 i ate free range chicken and eggs and i was against animal cruelty and i am still like that. Don’t speak for science science is stupid and cruel and i refuse to be a part of it why don’t they test on people? animals are more important