<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New ICANN Board members decided this weekend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kierenmccarthy.com/2006/09/16/new-icann-board-members-decided-this-weekend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2006/09/16/new-icann-board-members-decided-this-weekend/</link>
	<description>News and views on domain names, the Internet and life in general</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:11:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NomCom nonsense continues at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2006/09/16/new-icann-board-members-decided-this-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-7660</link>
		<dc:creator>NomCom nonsense continues at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2006/09/16/new-icann-board-members-decided-this-weekend/#comment-7660</guid>
		<description>[...] The NomCom went out of its way not to supply even the most basic information about its processes. It even keep the date and location of its meetings secret. And if I asked any of the members of the NomCom that I know personally, they refused to give even the most basic information. They had been told not to talk about any element whatsoever. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The NomCom went out of its way not to supply even the most basic information about its processes. It even keep the date and location of its meetings secret. And if I asked any of the members of the NomCom that I know personally, they refused to give even the most basic information. They had been told not to talk about any element whatsoever. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are the ICANN Senate hearings just a waste of time? at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2006/09/16/new-icann-board-members-decided-this-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-7659</link>
		<dc:creator>Are the ICANN Senate hearings just a waste of time? at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2006/09/16/new-icann-board-members-decided-this-weekend/#comment-7659</guid>
		<description>[...] And finally, Harold Feld of the Media Access Project. I owe Mr Feld an apology - I criticised him for talking out of his hat when he posted that the Internet Governance Forum was no more than a UN plot to get control of the Net. Mr Feld had in fact just posted the announcement notice which had come from &#8220;Americans for a Secure Internet&#8221; - another VeriSign front. Mr Feld knows a thing or two about ICANN. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And finally, Harold Feld of the Media Access Project. I owe Mr Feld an apology &#8211; I criticised him for talking out of his hat when he posted that the Internet Governance Forum was no more than a UN plot to get control of the Net. Mr Feld had in fact just posted the announcement notice which had come from &#38;#8220;Americans for a Secure Internet&#38;#8221; &#8211; another VeriSign front. Mr Feld knows a thing or two about ICANN. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

