<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A brief visit to ICANN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kierenmccarthy.com/2006/10/04/a-brief-visit-to-icann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2006/10/04/a-brief-visit-to-icann/</link>
	<description>News and views on domain names, the Internet and life in general</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:11:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Online participation website for ICANN at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2006/10/04/a-brief-visit-to-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-7817</link>
		<dc:creator>Online participation website for ICANN at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 15:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2006/10/04/a-brief-visit-to-icann/#comment-7817</guid>
		<description>[...] Paul was at the IGF in Athens last month and saw the site that Jeremy and I had done for the IGF in order to try to get some online interaction both by people that couldn&#8217;t be there and by those that were there. In fact, in retrospect, the whole thing dovetailed with a conversation I had had with Paul when I visited ICANN in Los Angeles on a whim two months ago. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paul was at the IGF in Athens last month and saw the site that Jeremy and I had done for the IGF in order to try to get some online interaction both by people that couldn&#38;#8217;t be there and by those that were there. In fact, in retrospect, the whole thing dovetailed with a conversation I had had with Paul when I visited ICANN in Los Angeles on a whim two months ago. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A visit to ICANN in Second Life at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2006/10/04/a-brief-visit-to-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-7816</link>
		<dc:creator>A visit to ICANN in Second Life at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2006/10/04/a-brief-visit-to-icann/#comment-7816</guid>
		<description>[...] Having visited ICANN&#8217;s headquarters in Los Angeles a month ago, I have finally got around to visiting the organisation&#8217;s virtual HQ in Second Life. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Having visited ICANN&#38;#8217;s headquarters in Los Angeles a month ago, I have finally got around to visiting the organisation&#38;#8217;s virtual HQ in Second Life. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieren</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2006/10/04/a-brief-visit-to-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-7815</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 22:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2006/10/04/a-brief-visit-to-icann/#comment-7815</guid>
		<description>There was a very good reason why I prevented comments on the Mac story. And you have neatly summarised why.


Kieren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a very good reason why I prevented comments on the Mac story. And you have neatly summarised why.</p>
<p>Kieren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Smith</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2006/10/04/a-brief-visit-to-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-7814</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2006/10/04/a-brief-visit-to-icann/#comment-7814</guid>
		<description>Since comments are closed on your other post concerning Apple and security, I figured I&#039;d post here.  I don&#039;t think that you should be accusatory towards people based on their response to your article.  If you read the main criticisms, they were based on the fact that your reporting was simply innacurate and/or incomplete.  Your latest diatribe mentioning past security problems in Mac products is an attempt to distract people from this.  If you had valid points based on verifiable facts, I&#039;m sure you might get some &quot;fanboy&quot; hate mail, but you wouldn&#039;t be as widely criticized as you have been.  At this point your attitude is similar to usenet trolling, IMHO.  Feel free to read the link below if you want to see why you were criticized.  It wasn&#039;t because everybody loves Apple so much.  It&#039;s because they can&#039;t stand poor journalism.

http://daringfireball.net/2006/09/jackass_kieren_mccarthy

Yours,
Matthew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since comments are closed on your other post concerning Apple and security, I figured I&#8217;d post here.  I don&#8217;t think that you should be accusatory towards people based on their response to your article.  If you read the main criticisms, they were based on the fact that your reporting was simply innacurate and/or incomplete.  Your latest diatribe mentioning past security problems in Mac products is an attempt to distract people from this.  If you had valid points based on verifiable facts, I&#8217;m sure you might get some &#8220;fanboy&#8221; hate mail, but you wouldn&#8217;t be as widely criticized as you have been.  At this point your attitude is similar to usenet trolling, IMHO.  Feel free to read the link below if you want to see why you were criticized.  It wasn&#8217;t because everybody loves Apple so much.  It&#8217;s because they can&#8217;t stand poor journalism.</p>
<p><a href="http://daringfireball.net/2006/09/jackass_kieren_mccarthy" rel="nofollow">http://daringfireball.net/2006/09/jackass_kieren_mccarthy</a></p>
<p>Yours,<br />
Matthew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieren</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2006/10/04/a-brief-visit-to-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-7813</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2006/10/04/a-brief-visit-to-icann/#comment-7813</guid>
		<description>Hey Wendy,

Do people really think the US government was behind ICANN being based in California? I&#039;d always assumed people realised that California - rather than Washington or Virginia - was a big nod to its technical origins.

I don&#039;t agree with your point about elsewhere but the US not having any impact though. The fact is that the US&#039; incredibly litigious culture has done, and is doing, no end of damage to ICANN. And the most obvious example is the one thing that everyone is complaining about: the VeriSign dotcom (and dotnet) agreements. What a different situation that would have been if VeriSign didn&#039;t have the US courts to use a pressure point.

Yours from a motel room with a moderate-sized window on North First Street in San Jose.


Kieren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Wendy,</p>
<p>Do people really think the US government was behind ICANN being based in California? I&#8217;d always assumed people realised that California &#8211; rather than Washington or Virginia &#8211; was a big nod to its technical origins.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree with your point about elsewhere but the US not having any impact though. The fact is that the US&#8217; incredibly litigious culture has done, and is doing, no end of damage to ICANN. And the most obvious example is the one thing that everyone is complaining about: the VeriSign dotcom (and dotnet) agreements. What a different situation that would have been if VeriSign didn&#8217;t have the US courts to use a pressure point.</p>
<p>Yours from a motel room with a moderate-sized window on North First Street in San Jose.</p>
<p>Kieren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Leibowitz</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2006/10/04/a-brief-visit-to-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-7812</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Leibowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2006/10/04/a-brief-visit-to-icann/#comment-7812</guid>
		<description>You might want to explain why ICANN is located in California. It is, in large part, because much of the pioneering work in developing the Internet was conducted in California, under the leadership of Jon Postel, first a UCLA (where he worked on Arpanet) and then at the University of Southern California. Many people seem to think that the US captured the Internet and dragged it to California, kicking and screaming. They also assume that if ICANN were located elsewhere--anywhere but the US--things would be different and better. Why?
As to driving in L.A.--you have my sympathies. As to not having a view of the marina--cry me a river.
From a windowless newsroom, Wendy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to explain why ICANN is located in California. It is, in large part, because much of the pioneering work in developing the Internet was conducted in California, under the leadership of Jon Postel, first a UCLA (where he worked on Arpanet) and then at the University of Southern California. Many people seem to think that the US captured the Internet and dragged it to California, kicking and screaming. They also assume that if ICANN were located elsewhere&#8211;anywhere but the US&#8211;things would be different and better. Why?<br />
As to driving in L.A.&#8211;you have my sympathies. As to not having a view of the marina&#8211;cry me a river.<br />
From a windowless newsroom, Wendy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

