<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Sunday Times article what was written for me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kierenmccarthy.com/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/</link>
	<description>News and views on domain names, the Internet and life in general</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:05:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sunday Times article version one</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2654</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday Times article version one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/#comment-2654</guid>
		<description>[...] To find out what on earth this is all about, please read this blog post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To find out what on earth this is all about, please read this blog post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday Times article version two</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2653</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday Times article version two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/#comment-2653</guid>
		<description>[...] should read this blog post before you delve into this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] should read this blog post before you delve into this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Am I keeping in touch with people - or just spreading tedious ditties? at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>Am I keeping in touch with people - or just spreading tedious ditties? at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>[...] I just noticed that the poll on my blog is out-of-date. It&#8217;s still going on about the Sunday Times article that I &#8220;wrote&#8221; over a month ago. I am pleased to see that 54 percent of people thought my original con-man version was the best, with just 20 percent going for the Sunday Times article that was written for me. I wonder how many people actually read them or whether they felt obliged to be nice to me. Or if they didn&#8217;t really give it much thought. It was just another online poll, wasn&#8217;t it? Probably the 19th they&#8217;d filled in that day. You have to feel sorry for historians of this era - how on earth are they ever going to filter all this crap into something useful? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I just noticed that the poll on my blog is out-of-date. It&#38;#8217;s still going on about the Sunday Times article that I &#38;#8220;wrote&#38;#8221; over a month ago. I am pleased to see that 54 percent of people thought my original con-man version was the best, with just 20 percent going for the Sunday Times article that was written for me. I wonder how many people actually read them or whether they felt obliged to be nice to me. Or if they didn&#38;#8217;t really give it much thought. It was just another online poll, wasn&#38;#8217;t it? Probably the 19th they&#38;#8217;d filled in that day. You have to feel sorry for historians of this era &#8211; how on earth are they ever going to filter all this crap into something useful? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday Times article on Sex.com at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2105</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday Times article on Sex.com at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 11:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/#comment-2105</guid>
		<description>[...] This is the article that appeared in The Sunday Times on Sex.com today. As I mentioned earlier, the article appears under my byline but was entirely written by a writer the Times brought in. I&#8217;m interested to see what people think of the two versions I wrote and the one that&#8217;s appeared. I&#8217;ll do a poll, but feel free to stick comments on any of my posts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is the article that appeared in The Sunday Times on Sex.com today. As I mentioned earlier, the article appears under my byline but was entirely written by a writer the Times brought in. I&#38;#8217;m interested to see what people think of the two versions I wrote and the one that&#38;#8217;s appeared. I&#38;#8217;ll do a poll, but feel free to stick comments on any of my posts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I saw this&#38;#8230; &#38;#187; the billblog</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator>I saw this&#38;#8230; &#38;#187; the billblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 00:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/#comment-2104</guid>
		<description>[...] A Sunday Times article what was written for me at kierenmccarthy.co.uk - An exercise in transparency from Kieren, author of sex.com and an old mate  china democracy epetition google journalism kierenmccarthy microsoft politics sex.com technology tories    &nbsp;   &laquo; I saw this&#8230; &#124;   &nbsp; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Sunday Times article what was written for me at kierenmccarthy.co.uk &#8211; An exercise in transparency from Kieren, author of sex.com and an old mate  china democracy epetition google journalism kierenmccarthy microsoft politics sex.com technology tories    &#38;nbsp;   &#38;laquo; I saw this&#38;#8230; |   &#38;nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name Wire: The Product Naming Blog</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator>Name Wire: The Product Naming Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 20:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/#comment-2103</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Recent Sale, Book Highlight Value of Sex.Com and Porn.com Domain Names...&lt;/strong&gt;

It&#039;s a sad but true fact that seedy domain names are among the most valuable on the Internet. A recent story set to be printed in the UK Sunday Times explores about the utter skullduggery around the sex.com domain name, which was stolen by Stephen Mic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Recent Sale, Book Highlight Value of Sex.Com and Porn.com Domain Names&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sad but true fact that seedy domain names are among the most valuable on the Internet. A recent story set to be printed in the UK Sunday Times explores about the utter skullduggery around the sex.com domain name, which was stolen by Stephen Mic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday Times article version two at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2102</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday Times article version two at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 08:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/#comment-2102</guid>
		<description>[...] You should read this blog post before you delve into this piece. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You should read this blog post before you delve into this piece. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday Times article version one at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://kierenmccarthy.com/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2101</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday Times article version one at kierenmccarthy.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 00:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2007/05/26/a-sunday-times-article-what-was-written-for-me/#comment-2101</guid>
		<description>[...] To find out what on earth this is all about, please read this blog post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To find out what on earth this is all about, please read this blog post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
